“For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him”
“A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers”
“All the gold which is under or upon the earth is not enough to give in exchange for virtue”
It doesn’t matter how much I say it, the reigns are not in the people’s hands.
The only way to get the public to make informed decisions, is to inform them.
Mob mentality usually relies on ignorance.
There is a difference between informing and fueling ignorance.
News today is all about fueling ignorance, this is why you have to dissect it before you digest it.
Ignorance, racism, prejudice is on both sides of the aisle on both sides of every conflict.
In some way right now I am being ignorant by what I am saying right now.
Yet again, the best way to kill ignorance is to be informed.
If you are still glued to your “Bipartisan System” which is very limiting, dissect and digest this.
United States Republicans essentially believe government is meant to be small, so that less capital is required to maintain it, and that is more monies for the public to spend.
United States Democrats basically think government must help those who can not help themselves, so if the government has more money it can fix more problems.
In places, these views mix. These basic ideas have huge problems. The problem is when legislation is passed to support something that one side mainly supports, the other side doesn’t agree with their basic method. A small government gets bigger when you legislate lifestyles. A big government cannot operate on a small budget. There are solutions to these generalities, but these generalities yet simple do not captivate the minds of our government. Why? They don’t care to be partisan, they want everything to be on their side, so there is no mending where the fences meet. So essentially we are unwound from the center.
The only way to legislate lifestyles, is to create communes that have common people. There is no way to keep a government small over a broad, diverse populous. So the solution to the problem for both sides, is to create local government for groups of people who are similar in culture and location. Then these groups can have their hand in federal government, links with other groups, decide for themselves their laws, and their way of life. Then the unsatisfied members of these groups can move to other groups with other legislation that they would more agree with. This makes legislation more personal, and more effective. Federal government would really only exist to link this mass of communities to the rest of the world, and keep them from quarreling. So, you may end up with more or less government, but the degree of separation is less, and your taxes are based on what your community has running in its government. If you want to have social health care, you can have it, and your neighboring community, with conflicting ideas will not be as affected. On average this would lower the ineffectiveness of taxes. In some cases you would be paying more, but that is because you are actually getting something for what you pay in. I really don’t need to explain any further, you either get the idea, or you can ask. Or maybe both.
The eventuality of the system improving is contingent on you.
Shaking the foundation requires repairs, and the greater the force, sometimes reconstruction.
In our case, the house is already dilapidated, it shouldn’t take much more stress.
“A house divided against itself cannot stand.”
-Abe Lincoln paraphrasing Jesus of Nazareth